首页> 外文OA文献 >Audiotapes and letters to patients: the practice and views of oncologists, surgeons and general practitioners
【2h】

Audiotapes and letters to patients: the practice and views of oncologists, surgeons and general practitioners

机译:录音带和给患者的信:肿瘤科医生,外科医生和全科医生的做法和观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A range of measures have been proposed to enhance the provision of information to cancer patients and randomized controlled trials have demonstrated their impact on patient satisfaction and recall. The current study explored the practice and views of oncologists, surgeons and general practitioners (GPs) with regards to providing patients with consultation audiotapes and summary letters. In stage 1, 28 semi-structured interviews with doctors were conducted to provide qualitative data on which to base a questionnaire. In stage 2, 113 medical oncologists, 43 radiation oncologists, 55 surgeons and 108 GPs completed questionnaires. Only one-third of doctors had ever provided patients with a copy of the letter written to the oncologist or referring doctor, and one-quarter had provided a summary letter or tape. The majority of doctors were opposed to such measures; however, a substantial minority were in favour of providing a letter or tape under certain conditions. More surgeons and GPs (> two-thirds) were opposed to specialists providing a consultation audiotape than oncologists (one-third). Gender, years of experience and attitude to patient involvement in decision-making were predictive of doctors' attitudes. The majority of doctors remain opposed to offering patients personalized information aids. However, practice and perspectives appear to be changing. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign
机译:已经提出了一系列措施来增强向癌症患者提供信息的能力,并且随机对照试验已经证明了它们对患者满意度和召回率的影响。本研究探讨了肿瘤学家,外科医生和全科医生(GPs)的做法和观点,旨在为患者提供咨询录音带和总结信。在第1阶段,对医生进行了28次半结构化访谈,以提供定性数据作为问卷的基础。在第2阶段中,有113位医学肿瘤学家,43位放射肿瘤学家,55位外科医生和108位GP完成了问卷。只有三分之一的医生曾经给患者提供过写给肿瘤科医生或转诊医生的信的副本,四分之一的医生提供了摘要信或录音带。大多数医生反对这种措施。但是,少数人赞成在某些条件下提供信件或录音带。相对于肿瘤科医生(三分之一),更多的外科医师和全科医生(>三分之二)反对提供专家录音带的专家。性别,多年的经验以及对患者参与决策的态度可以预示医生的态度。大多数医生仍然反对为患者提供个性化的信息帮助。但是,实践和观点似乎正在发生变化。 ©1999癌症研究运动

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号